Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 compliant. For disability-related modification or
accommodation including auxiliary aids or services, please call the Recording
Secretary 24-hours in advance Monday through Friday to ensure availability
(858) 637-3609
Maintenance and
Proposition MM School Bond
Independent Citizens’ Oversight Committee
March 20, 2007, 4:00 p.m.
Conference
Rooms A & B
MINUTES
|
AGENDA
ITEMS |
ASSIGNMENTS/UNDERSTANDINGS |
|
Meeting
Called to Order |
Mrs. Leonard called the meeting to order at
4:00 p.m. |
|
Roll
Call |
Members In Attendance:
Leon Brooks, Jesus Garcia, Tom Lemmon, Dorothy Leonard, Stuart MacDonald,
Phil Nerhood, Sheryll Norris, Bennett Peji and Leonard Pinson Members excused: Jon Tibbitts Member absent: Neil Derrough Staff and Consultants in Attendance: Delfino
Alemán Steve Bovee, Chuck Brown, Leigha Cook, Lee Dulgeroff, Scott Ellis, |
|
OLD
BUSINESS |
|
|
1.
Approval of Minutes 1.1.
February 20, 2007 (Exhibit) |
Motion: Mr. Nerhood moved that the draft meeting
minutes for February 20, 2007, be approved as presented. Mr. Pinson seconded the motion. The motion passed with no objection. |
|
2.
Public Testimony [No action or discussion may occur
regarding public comment on matters not on the agenda. Items may be referred to staff for
placement on a future agenda. Public testimony is limited to 3 minutes per
person.] |
No public testimony. |
|
3.
Executive Director of
Facilities’ Report (Umstot) (Information Only) 3.1.
Board of Education Update 3.2.
Salk Elementary Update 3.3.
Rodriguez Principal
Selection |
Mr. Umstot reported that his new title is Executive Director for Facilities Management and for Physical Plant Operations. Board of Education Update: The ICOC presentation at the Board of
Education (BOE) on March 13, 2007, was well received. Mr. Umstot stated he was thankful that ICOC
collaboratively helps solve Prop MM and Mr. Turko’s challenges. (3.1) Salk ES: Mr. Umstot directed readers to an article by
Helen Gao with the Union-Tribune located in Handout 10.1 titled “Endangered
shrimp delaying new school”. Umstot
continued that there is a conceptual agreement with the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife (USFW) and with the City of Mr. Umstot introduced Mr. Delfino Alemán, Area
5 Superintendent and Mr. Lyle Rangel.
Mr. Alemán stated the Rodriguez ES principal would be selected by
April 2007. Principal selection would
have occurred last August 2006, but that is the month he was hired by
SDUSD. He also hopes to hire the
best-qualified person for the community, and then staff/teachers would be
hired. There is a meeting Thursday
with the general community to discuss boundary issues at Mr. Alemán introduced Mr. Lyle Rangel, an
experienced administrator in the District, who would be assisting with the
Rodriguez opening preparations.
Furniture has been ordered and is being stored off-site. Mr. Rangel
plans to meet with Wendell Bass and Dave Umstot to clarify school opening
scope. Mrs. Leonard and Mr. MacDonald thanked Mr.
Alemán and Mr. Rangel for the encouraging words that progress is being made
in the construction and the administrative areas for a smooth and successful
school opening scheduled for September 2007.
(3.3) |
|
4.
Chair’s Report (Leonard) |
Mrs. Leonard thanked all the ICOC members who
were present at the Board of Education (BOE) meeting on March 13, 2007, at 3
pm for the yearly ICOC presentation.
She also thanked |
|
5. Report on
2006-2007 Plan. (Information Only) (Ellis) (Exhibit) 5.1.
Summary
of Charts 5.2.
Chart 1 – Proposition MM
Expenditure Plans by Fiscal Year 5.2.1. Chart 1A – Proposition MM Expenditure
Plan By Fiscal Year (Detail) 5.3. Chart 2 – Proposition MM Total Expenditure/ Balances by Program
Category 5.4. Schedule 1 – Cumulative Expenditures/ Balances By Program Category 5.5. Schedule 2 – Proposition MM Financial Summary Closeout Report 5.6. Chart 4 – 2004-2005 Planned Budget by Major Program Actual
Expenditures and Encumbrances/Commitments 5.7. Chart 5 – Future Major Repair and Replacement District Funded and
Proposition MM Funded Budget Projections and Annual Expenditures 5.8.
Chart 6 – Expenditures vs
Available Cash |
Mr. Ellis reported on the Proposition MM
Expenditure Plan Status Report through March 5, 2007. Chart 1:
In the 2006-2007 fiscal period, the green bar represents this year’s
plan at $152.6M. The expenditures to
date are $137.2M. (5.2) Chart 1A:
This chart shows that the predominance of the expenditures is
construction at $135.8M. Land
Acquisition is $1.4M. (5.2.1) Chart 2:
The projection goal at the end of the year is $1505.2B. This chart shows the cumulative position
relative to the cumulative plan.
Cumulative Expended is $1489.9M and Cumulative Scheduled is
$1456.0.4M. Prop MM is continuing to track ahead of the plan. (5.3) Schedule 1:
This chart shows the 14-Program Elements with their original Green
Sheet plan expenditures on the left hand column. As of March 5, 2007, total expenditures are
$1,489.8B or 98.7% of the program versus 91.1% of the work completed, which
is telling us that Prop MM is trending slightly over the budget. The $55M interest earnings are not
reflected on this chart. Mr. Ellis distributed Handout 5 and labeled it
Schedule 1A, which is a supplement to Schedule 1 and shows the explanation
for the variance to the original Green Sheet Budget. (5.4) Schedule 2:
This new chart shows the summary of the closeout of the program from
the prior month to the current month.
It is intended to show the remaining dollars for the various
associated areas to be spent. The
category balances are as follows: 1. Cumulative
Spent $1,489.8B 2.
Remaining Funds Available $20.1M 3.
Remaining Interest Earnings $55.0M 4.
Total Remaining Prop MM $75.1M 5.
Use Of State Funding Generated by Prop
MM 14.2M 6.
Total All Funding $89.3M In area B, Golden
Hill Playfield, shows a credit of $338,000, which shows Prop MM will be
reimbursed $738,000 for the Golden Hill land less $400,000 for design of the
gymnasium and other residual costs. The E-rate
settlement should be approved and received by the end of the fiscal year
2006-2007. Mr. Ellis stated that
Lincoln High and Sherman ES would also be eligible for reimbursement now when
applied for totaling approximately $1.2M.
(5.5) Chart 4:
This chart shows the breakdown for the $152.5M in planned expenditures
for this year by major program elements inclusive of direct support costs.
Actual Expenditures to date (137.2M) plus encumbrances/commitments of $45.1M
give a total of $182.3M. (5.6) Chart 5:
This chart shows the future major repair and replacement (FMRR.) There are no more Prop MM dollars
supplementing this activity. The plan
is $25M and the actual is $10.3M to date. (5.7) Chart 6: This chart shows the actual monthly expenditures relative to projected and actual cash position on hand. This chart has been updated manually to the cash position. There is a required ‘payback’ to the General Fund because of the GIC drawdown constraints. This chart reflects that Prop MM is ahead of the plan this year. (5.8) Mrs. Leonard asked the committee to think about a future date to stop the TIC presentation. Mr. Umstot suggested that six-months from now it would no longer be necessary. Action Item: Mrs. Leonard asked Mr. Ellis for a chart or matrix that shows all Projects funded by Prop MM state matching funds. |
|
6.
Planning
Subcommittee (Tibbitts) No March 2007 meeting.
Next meeting Monday, April 2, 2007, Maintenance and |
No report. |
|
7. Implementation Subcommittee (Garcia) 7.1. Minutes and Executive Summary for March 5,
2007 (Exhibit) 7.2. Contract Awards 2005/2006/2007 (Dulgeroff) (Information Only) (Exhibit) 7.3.
New School Status Report. (Dulgeroff) (Information
only) (Exhibit) 7.4.
Prop MM Climate Assessment Project (Leslie)
(Information only) (Exhibit) 7.5.
MRR Updated Plan and Funding Sources – Authorize
ICOC Consultant To Work With ICOC And District Staff To Develop Plan And
Establish A Separate Billing Code In Task 5 Of The Colby Technology Contract.
(MacDonald) (Possible Action) |
Mr. Dulgeroff reported on Contract Awards
2005, 2006 and 2007 dated March 5, 2007. 2005: Nearly all the scope and modernization
projects awarded in 2005 are either completed or nearing completion. 2006: Prop MM has awarded over $90M in
contracts. The two remaining
whole-site conversions are Marshall and Muir/Anderson. 2007: It is projected that $10-$15M
in small to medium sized projects will be awarded from the bond. To date there has been $491,286
awarded. Most are scope completion
projects; although, there is the Mr. Dulgeroff reported on the New School
Status Report updated March 1, 2007. Porter North ES: January 16, 2007, the school was
opened. The joint-use field is the
final Phase III between the north and south campuses. Griffith-Joyner ES: Planned opening September 2007. Rodriguez ES: (tight) Planned opening, September 2007. Fay ES: (tight) Planned opening changed from
September 2007 to September 2008.
Construction should be finished November 2007. Salk ES: Delayed until September 2010, but the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife are moving forward on the mitigation plan. The District is planning to use City of Memorial Middle: Delayed until the fall 2010, pending
resolution in house. Mr. Dulgeroff
commented that due to declining enrollment in the Memorial area and migration
to a K-8 configuration at many of the elementary schools in the area, that
the immediate need for a middle school may not be required. Golden Hill ES PE Facility:
Planned opening, September 2008.
It will move into bid award phase toward the end of the third quarter.
(7.3) Mr. Leslie reported on the Climate Assessment
Project dated March 2007. Scope of Work: SDUSD may be the only non-air conditioned
district in Budget: The Prop MM bond Green Sheet allocated $22M
and without PMO the budget is $20.5M.
The estimated cost of completion is $7.25M, which would leave a
positive variance to the bond of $13.25M. Phase IThe members in the task force included five
teachers, three principals, and one representative each from M & O and
Prop MM. Their mission was to set a
maximum temperature standard after reviewing 18-months of data. The Board of Education (BOE) approved a
78-degree standard. At 78-degrees,
classrooms would receive passive thermal mitigation and/or air
conditioning. New Prop MM schools
were BOE approved to be retrofitted for air-conditioning and existing schools
received preliminary designs and cost estimates to add passive measures
and/or air conditioning to existing classrooms in the future when funding
permits. Package units were selected
versus central air, which come with a compressor that is disconnected at
start up where installed at schools. Phase II – Climate ZonesThree climate zones were considered: Coastal – Meets temperature goals without
adding any passive upgrades or air conditioning. (West of Hwy 5) Between Coastal/Inland – Contains both passive
and active areas, which allows both measures to be allowed. (Hwy 5 to Hwy 15) Inland – Passive measures alone could not meet
the district’s temperature standards. (Hwy 15 to boundary Timeline ScheduleFrom start to finish: 2/99 – 12/07 Phase III – 10/06 – 12/07 Cost EstimatesZones II & III – ceiling fans: $5M Zone II – passive
measures: $55M No energy or
operating costs Zones II & III –
passive and active measures: $163M $3.6M annually =
maintenance and operation costs $3.5M annually = energy
costs New Schools: $61.3M for air-conditioning |