Approved on 
9/21/04, 
with change 
to item 6.5.San Diego Unified School District

 

Proposition MM School Bond

Independent Citizens’ Oversight Committee

MINUTES

August 17, 2004, 4:00 p.m.

M&O Training Room A & B

 

AGENDA ITEMS

ASSIGNMENTS/UNDERSTANDINGS

Meeting Called to Order

4:07 p.m. The meeting recessed at 4:18 for a brief “thank you” to Mr. Johnson and reconvened at 4:30.

Roll Call

ICOC members in attendance: Lisa Briggs, Leon Brooks, Jesus Garcia, Kris Hartnett, Hank Killmar, Dorothy Leonard, Stuart Mac Donald, Phil Nerhood and Mike Schatz.

Mr. Tibbitts and Mr. Chu were excused and out of town.

Staff members in attendance: Steve Bovee, Jim Bray, Chuck Brown, Graham Champion, Scott Ellis, Bob Kiesling, Tad Parzen, Scott Patterson, Cynthia Reed-Porter, Pat Snyder, Erika Wilgenburg,

(Guest) Gil Johnson introduced Mr. Leon Brooks, the new at large member.

Mr. Brooks expressed his interest in being involved with ICOC.

OLD BUSINESS

 

1.         Approval of Minutes July 20, 2004 (Handout)

Motion:  Mrs. Briggs moved to approve the draft minutes as submitted. Mr. Hartnett seconded the motion.  The motion passed without objection.

2.         Public Testimony [No action or discussion may occur regarding public comment on matters not on the agenda.  Items may be referred to staff for placement on a future agenda. Public testimony is limited to 3 minutes per person.]

Mr. Andy Berg spoke concerning the issues he brought to the ICOC in the past few meetings. Mr. Berg noted that those issues were being dealt with and going very well. Mr. Berg suggested that, in addition to the regular meetings with AGC, the district might consider meeting with American Subcontractor Association (ASA) and National Electrical Contractor Association (NECA) on a regular basis.

3.         Chief Facilities Officer’s Report on Approved Board of Education Items Regarding Proposition MM (Kiesling)

3.1.        Mr. Leon Brooks, Board approval (July 27, 2004)

3.2.        Status Report of Proposition MM (July 27, 2004)

Mr. Kiesling noted that Mr. Brooks was formally appointed to the ICOC by the Board of Education on July 27, 2004. (3.1)

Mr. Kiesling also noted that he had given a brief presentation on Proposition MM to the board. (3.2)

4.       Chair Report (Leonard)
4.1.        Appoint Annual Report Subcommittee

 

Mrs. Leonard appointed the following ICOC members to an Ad Hoc Annual Report Subcommittee:  Mr. Killmar, Chair; Mrs. Briggs and Mr. Nerhood.  All have agreed to serve on the committee.

Mrs. Leonard advised Mr. Brooks that the Governance Model for this committee indicates that each member serve on at least two subcommittees. For the time being, Mr. Brooks would serve on the Site Selection/School Opening Subcommittee. Mrs. Leonard noted that the Development Subcommittee will be looking at the whole committee structure and a new vice chair later this year.

5.       Report on 2004-2005 Plan (Ellis)

5.1.        Summary of Charts. (Handout)

5.2.        Chart 1 – Proposition MM Expenditure Plans by Fiscal Year

5.2.1.        Chart 1A – Total Program Expenditure Plan

5.2.2.        By Fiscal Year (Detail)

5.3.        Chart 2 – Proposition MM Cumulative Expenditure Plans

5.4.        Chart 3 – Comparative Distribution of Dollars by Program Category

5.4.1.        Schedule 1 – Total Expenditures/ Balances By Program Category

5.5.        Chart 4 – 2003-2004 Planned Budget by Major Program Actual Expenditures and Encumbrances/Commitments

5.5.1.        Chart 4A – 2003-2004 Planned Budget By Major Program Actual Expenditures and Encumbrances/commitments Comparison

5.6.        Chart 5 – Future Major Repair and Replacement District Funded and Proposition MM Funded Budget Projections and Actual Expenditures

5.7.        Chart 6 – Expenditures vs. Available Cash

5.8.        Chart 6A – Proposition MM Cash and Investment Balances

 

Mr. Ellis noted that the final report for 2003-2004, normally available by this time, was delayed by the DWA change until August 20, 2004. Mr. Ellis discussed the financials and answered questions regarding the charts. (5.*)

6.         Site Selection/School Opening Subcommittee Update (Killmar)

6.1.        Executive Summary and Meeting Minutes of August 2, 2004 (Handout)

6.2.        New School Transition Plan (Info Only)

6.3.        Memorial Area Middle School (Info Only)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.4.        Status Joint Use Discussions with City of San Diego (Info Only)

 

 

6.5.        New School Schedule Update (Handout)

 

In the absence of Mr. Gil Johnson Mr. Killmar chaired this subcommittee. Mr. Killmar noted that September was the anticipated date for three principals to be approved by the Board of Education. (6.2)

Mr. Killmar asked Mr. Jim Bray, to present the information regarding the Memorial Area Middle School.

Based on input received during community meetings and phone calls to district staff, Site B is currently the community favored site.  Site B is the site on which there is some vacant property.  SEDC and a developer are working to place 110 new for-sale condominiums on the vacant property.  They are expecting to obtain the necessary approvals in early November and break ground by Thanksgiving.  Thus it is expected that construction of the new condominiums will begin prior to the district completing the environmental process and selecting a site.

Councilmember Lewis had expressed his support for Site A, the northern most site bordered by 36th Street, Ocean View, 38th Street and Gilmore, to district staff prior to his unexpected death.  He felt it could be a catalyst for improving the community.  (6.3)

Mr. Kiesling stated that there still is no clear direction from the community on the Normal Heights area elementary school joint use field. The district has adjusted the request for bids to include either of the two remaining proposals allowing construction to be flexible. (6.4)

Mr. Killmar stated that the New School Schedule will be monitored and presented to the ICOC by Project Implementation Subcommittee. Some Site Selection/School Opening Subcommittee issues might still occur. (6.5)

7.         Reports and Audit Subcommittee (Nerhood)

7.1.        No Monthly Meeting Held

 

Mr. Nerhood noted that there had not been a meeting during the past month for Reports and Audits. However, a meeting has been set for September 10, 8:30 a.m. (7.1)

Mr. Nerhood asked Mr. Scott Patterson to advise the ICOC on the status of the bond issue.

Mr. Patterson explained the general bond process and indicated that the district's bond issuance was coming to market at a good time, since interest rates have trended lower. Issuance of $200 million of new bonds should be completed by August 20th. Because of the lower interest rates, Mr. Patterson noted that the district will attempt to refinance $300 million of existing debt. If successful, this would result in a savings of about $12 million in debt service for taxpayers.

A full report will be presented to the Reports and Audit subcommittee at it's September 10th meeting.

Action item: Mrs. Erika Wilgenburg was asked to prepare a press release on the strong bond issue.

8.         Project Implementation Subcommittee (Garcia)

8.1.        Executive Summary and Minutes for July 12, 2004 (Handouts)

8.2.        Status of Jefferson/HAR (Info Only)

 

 

 

 

8.3.        Labor Compliance (Handout)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.4.        Cost of Fencing Replacement Report and Executive Summary (Handout)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.5.        Contractor/Subcontractor Issues (NECA/ASA)(Handout)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.6.        Outreach Program Contract Update (Handout)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.7.        MRR Future Funding (Info Only)

 

 

8.8.        Status of State Funding Expenditures (Info Only)

 

 

8.9.        Active Construction Site Inspections (Info Only)

8.10.     New School Status Report (Refer to 6.5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.11.     Contract Award Status, 2004 (Handouts)

8.11.1.    Contract Award Status, 2003

8.11.2.    Punch List Status

 

 

8.12.     Projects With Significant Challenges (Handout)

Mr. Garcia stated that a quorum was not present at the last subcommittee meeting so there are no subcommittee recommendations.

The award of the Jefferson contract has been delayed. HAR Construction is the apparent low bidder. Mr. Tad Parzen noted that the law requires that the district award the contract to the "responsible low bidder." Mr. Parzen noted that “responsible” and “low bidder” are separate requirements. The district wanted to award the bid to the 2nd low bidder. HAR has requested a hearing, which will occur on September 8, 2004. An impartial panel will be chosen to make recommendations. The district hopes to award the contract on September 14, 2004. (8.2)

Mr. Parzen spoke of the labor compliance task force plan. Today’s version has the additional information of approximate times a given task could take. Labor compliance, dubbed the issue everyone loves to hate, will always have some issues. Nevertheless, the plan has been widely embraced by all parties concerned.

Motion:  Mr. Garcia moved to endorse the Labor Compliance plan as submitted. Mr. Killmar seconded the motion.  The motion passed without objection.

Action Item: Mr. Goshorn to draft a letter from the ICOC to the Board of Education to advise them of the ICOC’s endorsement of the Labor Compliance Plan. (8.3)

Mr. Goshorn presented the final report on the fence costs analysis as prepared by Mr. Larry Johnston, President of South Bay Fence, Inc.  Further information is available on the web site at http://prod031.sandi.net/propmm/fences.html. Concerns for safety and security lead the issues. Mr. Johnston’s conclusion is that fences at Washington, Kroc and Sequoia should be replaced. Mr. Johnston also concluded that the district’s contractor was well within current market costs for prevailing wage fence projects.

Motion:  Mr. Hartnett moved to accept the fence review report as submitted by Mr. Larry Johnston.  Mr. Killmar seconded the motion.  The motion passed without objection.

Motion:  Mr. Killmar moved that a letter regarding the outcome of the fence investigation be sent to KUSI, the Union Tribune and Mr. Turko on behalf of the ICOC.  Mr. Hartnett seconded the motion.  The motion passed without objection.  (8.4)

Mr. Hartnett discussed the four issues brought up by Mr. Andy Berg and Mrs. Anne Wright. The first was slow payment to subcontractors. The second was change orders payments. The third was expeditious closure of projects. In addition, the fourth was an over zealous labor compliance enforcement by the district.

An ad hoc committee comprised of Mr. Hartnett, Mr. Tibbitts and Mr. Killmar investigated the issues and recommended that payments to general contractors should be placed on the website as suggested by Mr. Berg.  The district agreed and expects to implement by September 1, 2004. Mr. Bovee provided historical information on change orders showing that 70.5% of change orders were processed within 30 days. The subcommittee found that statistic to be within industry standards. Some change orders were in the 45-day range with 150 days being the longest unresolved. The third concern was about not closing contracts in a timely fashion. The ad hoc committee recommends that the board delegate authority to Mr. Kiesling to issue “notice of completions” to eliminate the time required to schedule such actions at a meeting of the board. Regarding the labor compliance issue, it was found that the district already recognized and, along with other stakeholders, had recently created a plan to address the labor compliance issues.

Motion:  Mr. MacDonald moved to approve the report submitted by the ad hoc committee as presented. Mr. Garcia seconded the motion.  The motion passed without objection.

Motion:  Mr. Killmar moved that the ICOC recommend to the Board of Education that authority be given to the Chief Facilities Officer to approve “Notice of Completion” documents. Mr. Hartnett seconded the motion. The motion passed without objection.

Mr. Parzen said his staff had researched the “notice of completion” issue and noted that with proper authority, Mr. Kiesling can sign these documents. Asked if a board ratification was also required for each “notice of completion” issued, Mr. Parzen indicated that his staff was researching that question.

Action Item: Mr. Goshorn will draft a letter from the ICOC to the Board of Education requesting their approval of the Chief Facilities Officer having authority to sign “Notice of Completion” documents. (8.5)

Mr. Garcia noted that the Project Implementation Subcommittee had been advised that in the earlier stages of Proposition MM there were many contracts in the $1 to $2 million ranges that were with the reach of small and emerging businesses. Mr. Garcia noted that currently contracts are in the $5 to $15 million range. Mr. Garcia questioned if any contract could be “broken” into smaller segments. Mr. Kiesling stated that it would not be feasible to “break apart” the remaining large whole site renovation and new school projects into smaller pieces.

Mr. Kiesling noted that the contract with Latino Builders would be expiring in September. The district is looking at a one-year renewal for Latino Builders to keep track of outreach data.

Mr. Kiesling noted that staff was also looking at a Joint Consortium with the City of San Diego, County of San Diego, Port of San Diego, and other governmental agencies, wherein the district would pay a fair share of costs for Outreach efforts. CCDC has volunteered to coordinate the various public agencies.  Mr. Garcia and Mr. Kiesling acknowledges that it was the ICOC’s Robert Fogg that originally suggested such an inter-agency outreach effort several years ago. (8.6)

Mr. Garcia advised that the ICOC consultant, Mr. Goshorn, is working on issues related to MRR future funding. Mr. Goshorn noted that the state legislature is looking at methods to handle public infrastructure in general. Mr. Goshorn will come back to the Project Implementation Subcommittee with more information at the September 13, 2004 meeting. (8.7)

State funding expenditures. Nothing to report.

Mr. Peterson noted that, at the last Board of Education meeting, the board was asked to allocate funds for high priority capital needs. The board requested a ‘big picture’ report and staff is in the process of getting the information prepared. (8.8)

Construction site inspection. The McKinley inspection report is not yet available. (8.9)

New Schools Status Report will be handled in the Project Implementation Subcommittee. Site Selection/School Opening Subcommittee will only be involved as necessary. Golden Hill elementary will have an approximate 15% overrun for the grading portion only. The Project Implementation Subcommittee minutes and executive summary will be corrected to reflect that the 15% overrun is for grading only.

Engineers and Architects have a 2% standard errors and omissions leeway. At the end of the project, the district will assess the over all picture and would seek to recoup that funding from the designer when and where applicable. (8.10)

Mr. Brown advised the committee that there are six whole sites and nine new school contracts yet to be awarded. The Lincoln contract is scheduled to have the bid opening on September 21, 2004, with an award date targeted for October 1. There was a prequalification process for the $50 million project, 6 or 7 contractors expressed interest and several have been prequalified. (8.11)

Mr. Kiesling discussed Projects With Significant Challenges noting item 3 regarding lack of bidders is the result of limited subcontractors rather than prime contractors. In today’s climate there is a lot of work that subcontractors can choose from.

Mr. Kiesling stated that Golden Hill elementary has a number of issues. A grading contractor spilled spoils into the creek bed. Mr. Bovee stated that a “Clean up and Abatement” Order (CAO) was issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region.  A biologist has already reviewed and created a restoration plan. The spill should not affect the grading schedule. It was determined that the contractor was not following procedures and will be back charged from the grading contract for costs associated with the damage.  The district did not receive a fine but has been assessed an administration fee. Mr. Kiesling will make a follow-up report to the Project Implementation Subcommittee at their September meeting. (8.12)

Mr. Garcia noted that Stuart MacDonald will chair the September meeting in his absence.

Mrs. Briggs noted that ASA was becoming more active and the district needs to consider strengthening its association.

9.         Development Subcommittee (Briggs)

9.1.        Minutes for August 11, 2004 (Handout)

9.2.        Chair for Site Selection/School Opening Subcommittee (Action Requested)

 

9.3.        Governance Model Update

Mrs. Briggs noted that, if nominated by the ICOC, Mr. Tibbitts would accept the chairperson position for this subcommittee.

Motion:  Mrs. Briggs moved that the ICOC nominate and approve Mr. Jon Tibbitts as chairperson for the Site Selection/School Opening Subcommittee. Mr. Killmar seconded the motion.  The motion passed without objection. (9.2)

Mrs. Briggs said that the Governance Model structure had been reviewed earlier this year. It is now time to look at the broader matrix. Mr. Goshorn gave an excellent presentation on how the issues relate to each subcommittee. Mr. Goshorn will make the same presentation to the Project Implementation and Site Selection/New School Opening subcommittees at their next meeting.

Mr. MacDonald expressed his appreciation of the Governance Model presentation made by Mr. Goshorn.

10.      Steering Subcommittee (Leonard)

10.1.     No Meeting Scheduled

Mrs. Leonard stated that a Steering Subcommittee meeting is scheduled for October 6, 2004 at 1:00 pm.

11.      Communication Monthly Update (Handout) (Wilgenburg)

Mrs. Wilgenburg commented on the articles.

Mrs. Wilgenburg emphasized that the playground equipment removed from Pacific Beach Elementary was supposed to have been disposed of by the contractor. Instead, the contractor offered it to and installed it at a school in the east county. The school has been notified by SDUSD that the equipment is no longer up to code and therefore constitutes a safety hazard.

Mr. MacDonald thanked Mrs. Wilgenburg on the great job she had done on the website.

New Business

 

1.         Chief Facilities Officer’s Report (Kiesling)

Mr. Kiesling reported on a flood at Wangenheim Middle School caused by contractor error.  Fortunately, it will not effect the opening day of school.

Mr. Kiesling reported that the board approved a modular contract for Lincoln and Normal Heights schools. The contract is expected to save about $9 million.

Mr. Kiesling advised that Paula Ross, who is suffering from carpel tunnel syndrome, has been advised by her doctors not to return to her position at ICOC. Her medical advisors will continue to evaluate her situation.

2.         ICOC Chair Report (Leonard)

Mrs. Leonard and Mr. Killmar are working with Mr. Kiesling and Ms. Bergam for a permanent replacement for Mrs. Ross.

Mr. Hartnett and Mr. Garcia will be out of town during the September 21, 2004 ICOC Meeting.

3.         Adjournment

6:03 p.m.